Subject: [xsl] Vendor extensions for XSLT - higher order functions From: Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:14:50 +0900 |
Hi xsl-list, I am curious to know why some XSLT vendors have implemented one or more XSLT extension functions with their product to make for the implementation of higher-order functions (HOF) in XSLT. Given that Dimitre Novatchev of FXSL fame published his functional programming library for XSLT, namely FXSL, as early as XSLT 1.0, refer http://fxsl.sourceforge.net/articles/FuncProg/Functional%20Programming.html why would an XSLT vendor implement similar functionality as XSLT extension elements and/or functions and not just recommend using the FXSL library. AFAIK, FXSL is 100% compatible with both of the W3C XSLT 1.0 and 2.0 recommendations. Surely one would think it undesirable to implement related functionality as a non-W3C extension if similar functionality already existed in a 100% compliant XSLT library. Do Altova and Apache XSLT products have HOF extensions for XSLT? I am aware that Saxonica offer it (via the saxon:function extension function) in Saxon-SA but am not sure about the others. Best wishes to all. Justin Johansson
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0: Schema-aware pr, Justin Johansson | Thread | RE: [xsl] Vendor extensions for XSL, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local function, Colin Paul Adams | Date | RE: [xsl] [xslt 2.0] Local function, Justin Johansson |
Month |