Re: [xsl] Tunnelled params and variables

Subject: Re: [xsl] Tunnelled params and variables
From: Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:14:47 +0900
Hi Andrew, Angela &amp; Ken

Thanks for the info re

>>What are the use cases for having tunnel="yes" on xsl:params and variables?

I have used tunnel="yes" with success in XSLT projects but feel that, in
someway,
the ad-hoc use thereof could lead to a poor programming practice and this was
the motivation for my question.  If any of you can offer a view on this,
that would
be great.  To me is seems like a good measure for retrofit to stylesheets gone
out of control.

BTW.  It looks like the electronic-terrorists (aka spammers) are winning in
their
aim of destroying our liberties.  I feel somewhat intimidated having
received this
auto response from my latest posting to the xsl-list.  Copy below;  any
comments?

Regards
Justin J

<what-the-??ck>
ATTENTION!

A message you recently sent to a 0Spam.com user with the subject "[xsl]
Tunnelled params and variables" was not delivered because they are using
the 0Spam.com anti-spam service.  Please click the link below to confirm
that this is not spam. When you confirm, this message and all future
messages you send will automatically be accepted.

http://www.0spam.com/v.cgi?user=1072546563&verify=643452


========================================
This is an automated message from 0Spam.com.
Please do not reply to this Email.

Looking for a free anti-spam service?
Visit us at http://www.0spam.com to find out more.
</what-the-??ck>
Justin Johansson

*** A horse with no name is called Lambda ***

Current Thread