Subject: Re: [xsl] Tunnelled params and variables From: Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:14:47 +0900 |
Hi Andrew, Angela & Ken Thanks for the info re >>What are the use cases for having tunnel="yes" on xsl:params and variables? I have used tunnel="yes" with success in XSLT projects but feel that, in someway, the ad-hoc use thereof could lead to a poor programming practice and this was the motivation for my question. If any of you can offer a view on this, that would be great. To me is seems like a good measure for retrofit to stylesheets gone out of control. BTW. It looks like the electronic-terrorists (aka spammers) are winning in their aim of destroying our liberties. I feel somewhat intimidated having received this auto response from my latest posting to the xsl-list. Copy below; any comments? Regards Justin J <what-the-??ck> ATTENTION! A message you recently sent to a 0Spam.com user with the subject "[xsl] Tunnelled params and variables" was not delivered because they are using the 0Spam.com anti-spam service. Please click the link below to confirm that this is not spam. When you confirm, this message and all future messages you send will automatically be accepted. http://www.0spam.com/v.cgi?user=1072546563&verify=643452 ======================================== This is an automated message from 0Spam.com. Please do not reply to this Email. Looking for a free anti-spam service? Visit us at http://www.0spam.com to find out more. </what-the-??ck> Justin Johansson *** A horse with no name is called Lambda ***
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Tunnelled params and vari, G. Ken Holman | Thread | [xsl] IE Client side transformation, Ilya Sterin |
[xsl] Tunnelled params and variable, Justin Johansson | Date | [xsl] IE Client side transformation, Ilya Sterin |
Month |