Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most immediate parentNode

Subject: Re: [xsl] Getting variable yet most immediate parentNode
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:02:06 +0100
me>(@value,@name,.)[1]

wendell> ... and in XPath 1.0, you're forced into explicit testing, since 
wendell> attributes have no order in the data model.


or, if you must, (@value|@name[not(../@value)]|.)[last()] but perhaps's
that's "explicit testing". How explicit does something have to be to be
"explicit"? 

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread