Re: [xsl] Converting a string to Uppercase or Lowercase without using translate() ?

Subject: Re: [xsl] Converting a string to Uppercase or Lowercase without using translate() ?
From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 16:58:33 +0000
Why bother? It already has angle-brackets everywhere.
I never could understand why all those detractors of lisp syntax (i.e.
DSSSL in particular) find SGML/XML syntax to be an improvement.

On 27/11/2007, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 27/11/2007, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > At 2007-11-27 15:14 +0000, Andrew Welch wrote:
> > >or perhaps "manage" your namespaces:
> > >
> > ><!ENTITY xslt-ns 'http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform'>
> > >
> > ><xsl:stylesheet xmlns="&xslt-ns;" version="2.0">
> > >
> > >I know I'm being silly now...
> >
> > Not really ... I've used entities for namespace URI strings when a
> > vocabulary changes its URI but the transformation of the elements is
> > unchanged:  keep a master copy of the stylesheet in a source code
> > control system, deploy copies to two directories, use parameter
> > entities to define general entities with the namespace URI string,
> > and then each stylesheet supports a different version of the URI string.
>
> Or just transform the original once per namespace update (or just do
> it manually - you'd have to hand edit each copy to insert the entity
> refs anyway).
>
> It probably wasn't the worst example I could've come up with.
>
> Maybe we should have a go at obfuscating XSLT through over zealous use
> of entities... like turning the identity template into the &ident;
> entity ref:
>
> <!DOCTYPE xsl:stylesheet [
> <!ENTITY xslt-ns 'http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform'>
> <!ENTITY opt '<xsl:output indent="yes"/>'>
> <!ENTITY ident '<xsl:template
> match="@*|node()"><xsl:copy><xsl:apply-templates
> select="@*|node()"/></xsl:copy></xsl:template>'>
> ]>
> <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="&xslt-ns;"
>     version="2.0">
>     &opt;
>     &ident;
> </xsl:stylesheet>
>
> :)

Current Thread