|
Subject: Re: [xsl] saxon:try() From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:09:43 +0000 |
>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Michael> You can do it that way - treating a variable reference
Michael> rather like a function call - but it gets difficult if
Michael> one reference to a variable is inside a try/catch and
Michael> another isn't (or is in a different try/catch). Do you
Michael> catch the error twice?
I think if the two references are in two different try/catch
instructions, then yes, the same error should be caught twice.
If one reference is outside of a try/catch instruction, then it will
cause termination of the transformation, at that reference point.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] saxon:try(), Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Florent Georges |
| Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Andrew Welch | Date | RE: [xsl] document() function and e, Scott Trenda |
| Month |