RE: [xsl] document() function and error-handling

Subject: RE: [xsl] document() function and error-handling
From: "Scott Trenda" <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:55:52 -0600
>>Although I suppose this is
>>not so harsh when compared to being reprimanded by the list owner for
>>*not* following list guidelines. ;)
>
>My bark is FAR worse than my bite!

Haha, I'm sure. But it's still quite disconcerting when the reply shows
"XSL-List Owner" as the sender. Kind of like the voice of God. "YOU
SCREWED UP. NO."

~ Scott


-----Original Message-----
From: XSL-List Owner [mailto:xsl-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 8:59 PM
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [xsl] document() function and error-handling

At 6:14 PM -0600 1/3/08, Scott Trenda wrote:
>Damned if you do and damned if you don't, eh?

And why should XSL-List be different from anywhere else?


>Although I suppose this is
>not so harsh when compared to being reprimanded by the list owner for
>*not* following list guidelines. ;)

My bark is FAR worse than my bite!

-- Tommie
--

======================================================================
B. Tommie Usdin                        mailto:btusdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.                http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street                           Phone: 301/315-9631
Suite 207                                    Direct Line: 301/315-9634
Rockville, MD  20850                                 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in XML and SGML
======================================================================

Current Thread