Subject: Re: [xsl] Difference in priority of node() and * From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:32:04 +0530 |
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm afraid I have absolutely no idea. The decision was made before my time. > > But it would raise the question of whether @* and @node() should be the > same... I would logically reason that, * should have higher priority than node(), as node() is more generic pattern than *. Can this be thought as bug in the spec? Is it appropriate to put it in W3C bigzilla. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Difference in priority of, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] Difference in priority of, Michael Kay |
Fwd: Fw: [xsl] Grouping problem, Eugene Bernard | Date | [xsl] How to test the parent name, Mansour |
Month |