Subject: RE: [xsl] Complex recursion in XSLT 1.0 From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:06:12 -0000 |
If you're going to resort to escaping to Java and using mutable objects that way, then you can probably use a completely different algorithm. But that's cheating... In any case, using XSLT 2.0 sequences to maintain a stack is really dead easy. (In this case I don't think it even needs to be a stack, strictly speaking - it can just be a queue of elements awaiting processing, and you can probably take them off the queue in any order.) Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Mukul Gandhi [mailto:gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 18 February 2008 17:16 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] Complex recursion in XSLT 1.0 > > On Feb 18, 2008 7:43 PM, Marroc <marrocdanderfluff@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Perhaps if I build a stack as a node-set I might be able to > crack this one! > > To implement Stack in the XSLT stylesheet, you might use a > Java extension for using Stack in an external Java object. > This should be easily achievable. > > > -- > Regards, > Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Complex recursion in XSLT, Mukul Gandhi | Thread | Re: [xsl] Complex recursion in XSLT, Mukul Gandhi |
RE: [xsl] defining output document , James Sulak | Date | [xsl] Insert new element depending , Gerhard Glatz |
Month |