Re: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0

Subject: Re: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0
From: Liam Quin <liam@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:52:57 -0400

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 04:43:16PM +0100, Michael Kay wrote:
> [...] Currently available XSLT 2.0 processors are Saxon, Gestalt, and
> AltovaXML.

There's an IBM XSLT 2.0 implementation that I've encountered in
some hardware dedicated to message processing, too. (x35? I've
forgotten, sorry).

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the children node-sets.., (continued) Abel Braaksma - 22 Apr 2008 14:48:42 -0000 Dan Acuff - 22 Apr 2008 15:40:07 -0000 Michael Kay - 22 Apr 2008 15:43:47 -0000 Dan Acuff - 22 Apr 2008 15:47:10 -0000 Liam Quin - 22 Apr 2008 19:53:28 -0000 <= Martin Honnen - 22 Apr 2008 15:44:10 -0000 Andrew Welch - 22 Apr 2008 16:40:22 -0000 Wendell Piez - 22 Apr 2008 19:38:39 -0000 Message not available Andrew Welch - 23 Apr 2008 08:55:11 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the children node-sets.., (continued)
- Abel Braaksma - 22 Apr 2008 14:48:42 -0000
  - Dan Acuff - 22 Apr 2008 15:40:07 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 22 Apr 2008 15:43:47 -0000
    - Dan Acuff - 22 Apr 2008 15:47:10 -0000
    - Liam Quin - 22 Apr 2008 19:53:28 -0000 <=
    - Martin Honnen - 22 Apr 2008 15:44:10 -0000
  - Andrew Welch - 22 Apr 2008 16:40:22 -0000
  - Wendell Piez - 22 Apr 2008 19:38:39 -0000
  - Message not available
    - Andrew Welch - 23 Apr 2008 08:55:11 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, Dan Acuff	Thread	Re: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, Martin Honnen
Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally lo, Wendell Piez	Date	Re: [xsl] Descendant::??, David Carlisle
	Month