Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the children node-sets..
From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:39:58 +0100

On 22/04/2008, Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Dan Acuff wrote:
>
> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
> >
> >
>
>  Unless there's a compelling reason to do so, it is generally best to stick
> to one of the Unicode encodings, UTF-8 for example, it will save you a lot
> of encoding problems later.

US-ASCII is the encoding of choice when you are having problems - all
processes downstream will handle single byte ascii but quite often
struggle with multi-byte UTF-8.  As long as the content is re-parsed
before a human gets to see it then US-ASCII should probably be the
default.

b is the clue that somewhere in the pipe isn't talking utf-8...

--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, (continued) Michael Kay - 22 Apr 2008 15:43:47 -0000 Dan Acuff - 22 Apr 2008 15:47:10 -0000 Liam Quin - 22 Apr 2008 19:53:28 -0000 Martin Honnen - 22 Apr 2008 15:44:10 -0000 Andrew Welch - 22 Apr 2008 16:40:22 -0000 <= Wendell Piez - 22 Apr 2008 19:38:39 -0000 Message not available Andrew Welch - 23 Apr 2008 08:55:11 -0000 Colin Adams - 23 Apr 2008 09:16:24 -0000 Message not available Wendell Piez - 23 Apr 2008 16:08:22 -0000

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, Martin Honnen	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally lo, Wendell Piez
RE: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally lo, Dan Acuff	Date	[xsl] Descendant::??, Dan Acuff
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home