Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the children node-sets..

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally loop? not grabbing all the children node-sets..
From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:15:59 +0100

On 23/04/2008, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  but 2.0 is such a massive leap forward which once
>  you've made that jump, you never really want to go back.

I fully agree. Indeed I refuse to admit to knowing any XSLT 1.0 (and
in fact I probably don't anymore).

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] MSXML 6 and XSLT 2.0, (continued) Martin Honnen - 22 Apr 2008 15:44:10 -0000 Andrew Welch - 22 Apr 2008 16:40:22 -0000 Wendell Piez - 22 Apr 2008 19:38:39 -0000 Message not available Andrew Welch - 23 Apr 2008 08:55:11 -0000 Colin Adams - 23 Apr 2008 09:16:24 -0000 <= Message not available Wendell Piez - 23 Apr 2008 16:08:22 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally lo, Andrew Welch	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSL-T should naturally lo, Wendell Piez
Re: [xsl] Force Unicode change, David Carlisle	Date	RE: [xsl] Force Unicode change, Pankaj Chaturvedi
	Month