Subject: Re: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance? From: "Colin Adams" <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:06:53 +0100 |
On 30/04/2008, Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I stumbled upon these two statements, both by Colin Paul Adams. > > As for Gestalt versus xsltproc [...] Xsltproc will run faster, > but is non-compliant to the XSLT 1.0 recommendation. > -- > http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/200701/post40510.html > > [...] when I still used XSLT [1.0, M. L.], I would use xsltproc > for my processor, due to its famed speed (I wasn't aware of its > non-compliance at the time) [...] > -- http://colina.demon.co.uk/?q=node/20 > > What exactly does xsltproc's (that is: LibXSLT's) non-compliance (with > the spec, I guess) consist in? I don't know in full at all. Others on this list might be able to do better. The one thing I do know is that is doesn't complain if you code select= rather than match= on an xsl:template. Not a show-stopper.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compli, Michael Ludwig | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-co, Michael Ludwig |
[xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compli, Michael Ludwig | Date | Re: [xsl] Problem with Safari?, Manfred Staudinger |
Month |