Re: [xsl] xsltproc/LibXSLT - non-compliance?

["Manfred Staudinger" <manfred.staudinger@xxxxxxxxx>]

> On 30/04/2008, Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> >  I'd still be interested to know if (a) there is more to LibXSLT's
>  >  non-conformance
What I posted in a parallel thread
http://www.biglist.com/cgi-bin/wilma/wilma_hiliter/xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/200804/msg00515.html?line=8#hilite
may well turn out to be such a non-conformance.

Regards,

Manfred

2008/4/30 Colin Adams <colinpauladams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 30/04/2008, Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> >  I'd still be interested to know if (a) there is more to LibXSLT's
>  >  non-conformance and (b) if there is anything like a test suite in
>  >  order to determine a processor's degree of conformance.
>
>  There is a test suite.
>
>  I am not familiar with the XSLT 1.0 test suite though, so I can't say
>  how well it catches non-coformance, other than to say it cannot be
>  infallible.
>
>  I am familiar with the 2.0 test suite, but this is only accessible to
>  W3C members and invited experts.