Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation with XSLT 2.0 From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 08:29:33 -0700 |
> > > > Just read the relevant W3 Specs and any good XSLT book. > > > > You could reply with that to any question... > > > not really, the relevant W3 specs are not meant to be read by users > of the language but implementors. While user-friendliness is often not a goal, no such specification forbids anyone from reading it, and users with a grain of curiosity usually do. Shouldn't users report bugs? How can we report a bug in an implementation, without having read the spec? And what if there are two good books that say different things about a feature? Isn't then the spec the "true source" to be used in resolving any such ambiguities? -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, bryan rasmussen | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, Liam Quin |
Re: [xsl] function-available return, James Fuller | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT Programmer's Referen, Dave Pawson |
Month |