Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation with XSLT 2.0

On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 08:29:33AM -0700, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
> And what if there are two good books that say different things about a
> feature? Isn't then the spec the "true source" to be used in resolving
> any such ambiguities?

Not always -- you have to compare what implementations actually do in
such cases; sometimes the best anser is to change the specification to
reflect actual implementations.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation with XSLT 2.0, (continued) Mukul Gandhi - 4 May 2008 09:07:38 -0000 Andrew Welch - 4 May 2008 11:56:43 -0000 bryan rasmussen - 4 May 2008 15:06:04 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 4 May 2008 15:29:59 -0000 Liam Quin - 5 May 2008 11:04:09 -0000 <= Dimitre Novatchev - 5 May 2008 12:24:38 -0000 Tony Graham - 5 May 2008 13:33:04 -0000 Andrew Welch - 5 May 2008 19:12:46 -0000 Michael Kay - 5 May 2008 19:24:23 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation with XSLT 2.0, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, Dimitre Novatchev	Thread	Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, Dimitre Novatchev
Re: [xsl] XSLT Programmer's Referen, M. David Peterson	Date	Re: [xsl] Re: Output validation wit, Dimitre Novatchev
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home