Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:sort with XSLT 2.0 translated to XSLT 1.0 From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:44:52 +0100 |
2008/6/19 David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> What's wrong with: >> >> (@bar | @baz)[1] > > it would sort on (fr each item) either baz or bar with no specification > of which is chosen. Ahh good point - if both are present either could be used, as document order can't be relied on (bad idea anyway) > (@bar|self::*[not(@bar)]/@baz)[1] > > does the job. Or just @bar | @baz[not(../bar)] ? -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:sort with XSLT 2.0 tr, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl:sort with XSLT 2.0 tr, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] xsl:sort with XSLT 2.0 tr, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl:sort with XSLT 2.0 tr, David Carlisle |
Month |