Re: [xsl] the future of xslt

["bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think a better source for figuring out the status of a particular
technology or set of technologies is to take a central website (or
websites)
and use the trends for websites feature, for example:

http://trends.google.com/websites?q=xml.com%2C+biglist.com%2C+xml.coverpages.org&geo=all&date=all&sort=0

That looks more interesting.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen



On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:23 AM, M. David Peterson
<m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:15:43 -0600, bryan rasmussen
> <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> OReilly, xslt, xsl, xquery
>>
>> http://www.google.com/trends?q=OReilly%2C+xslt%2C+xsl%2C+xquery%2C+xpath+&ctab=0&geo=all
>> OReilly, Linq, IronPython
>>
>> http://www.google.com/trends?q=OReilly%2C+linq%2C+ironpython&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0
>
> How are these composite?  What I'm referring to would look something more
> like "xslt OR xsl OR xpath, xquery" from the search box (though this doesn't
> work) where the OR operator combines the search into a composite of all the
> results for each search term.
>
> --
> /M:D
>
> M. David Peterson
> Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
> Email: m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | m.david@xxxxxx
> Mobile: (206) 999-0588
> http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm |
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354