Subject: Re: [xsl] the future of xslt From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:15:43 +0200 |
for example OReilly, xslt, xsl, xquery http://www.google.com/trends?q=OReilly%2C+xslt%2C+xsl%2C+xquery%2C+xpath+&ctab=0&geo=all OReilly, Linq, IronPython http://www.google.com/trends?q=OReilly%2C+linq%2C+ironpython&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 since the outputs are available as CSV files I guess comparison is not especially difficult, although I think I have a more interesting way to compare. Cheers, Bryan Rasmussen On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:06 AM, bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > yes, that's what I did it in mine, at least the combination of several > phrases into one composite search term. > > Cheers, > Bryan Rasmussen > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:53 PM, M. David Peterson > <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:49:36 -0600, Philip Fearon <pgfearo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> So >>> yes, it turns out that this example is of little significance, but not >>> meaningless in my view. Variations should still be checked out. >> >> Sure. Is there a way with Google Trends to combine several phrases into one >> composite search term for comparison against another (possibly composite) >> search term? >> >> -- >> /M:D >> >> M. David Peterson >> Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC >> Email: m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | m.david@xxxxxx >> Mobile: (206) 999-0588 >> http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm | >> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, bryan rasmussen | Thread | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, M. David Peterson |
Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, bryan rasmussen | Date | Re: [xsl] the future of xslt, M. David Peterson |
Month |