Re: [xsl] the future of xslt

Subject: Re: [xsl] the future of xslt
From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:15:43 +0200
for example

OReilly, xslt, xsl, xquery
http://www.google.com/trends?q=OReilly%2C+xslt%2C+xsl%2C+xquery%2C+xpath+&ctab=0&geo=all

OReilly, Linq, IronPython
http://www.google.com/trends?q=OReilly%2C+linq%2C+ironpython&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0

since the outputs are available as CSV files I guess comparison is not
especially difficult, although I think I have a more interesting way
to compare.

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:06 AM, bryan rasmussen
<rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> yes, that's what I did it in mine, at least the combination of several
> phrases into one composite search term.
>
> Cheers,
> Bryan Rasmussen
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:53 PM, M. David Peterson
> <m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:49:36 -0600, Philip Fearon <pgfearo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> So
>>> yes, it turns out that this example is of little significance, but not
>>> meaningless in my view. Variations should still be checked out.
>>
>> Sure.  Is there a way with Google Trends to combine several phrases into one
>> composite search term for comparison against another (possibly composite)
>> search term?
>>
>> --
>> /M:D
>>
>> M. David Peterson
>> Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
>> Email: m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | m.david@xxxxxx
>> Mobile: (206) 999-0588
>> http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm |
>> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354

Current Thread