Re: [xsl] the future of xslt

["bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx>]

I realized what it was, basically having two words in a query and a
single one in another, in cases where the search is something
relatively non-mainstream - like my xsl-t xsl-fo example, means that
Google won't have enough results in the query with multiple terms to
make a useful comparison, it works if you do something like comparing
the results for Obama Clinton, McCain then you can compare.

Or in cases like python .Net, c# .Net
http://www.google.com/trends?q=python+.Net%2C+c%23+.Net&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0
you have just barely enough data in the Python .Net part to make a
comparison.

or http://www.google.com/trends?q=xml+xslt%2C+c%23+.Net&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=1


better than nothing all the way I guess.



Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 1:47 AM, M. David Peterson
<m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:27:47 -0600, bryan rasmussen
> <rasmussen.bryan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I don't think so, whenever I've looked I've had results of 0 for the
>> grouped query, which doesn't make much sense.
>
> Yeah, which sucks!  Seems like it would be an obvious and easy thing to do.
>
> --
> /M:D
>
> M. David Peterson
> Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
> Email: m.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | m.david@xxxxxx
> Mobile: (206) 999-0588
> http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm |
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354