Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT

Subject: Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT
From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:16:00 +0100

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> writes:

    Scott> My reply is getting a little off-topic, but on the same
    Scott> note, why haven't we seen a widely-used XML-based HTML
    Scott> preprocessor language yet?

Pre-processors are just bad. (If you mean macro processors, that
is. If you mean transformation languages, such as XSLT, then you have
the answer to your own question.)
-- 
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, (continued) Colin Paul Adams - 27 Jun 2008 14:34:12 -0000 Alexander Johannesen - 27 Jun 2008 15:07:46 -0000 Colin Paul Adams - 27 Jun 2008 15:10:55 -0000 Scott Trenda - 27 Jun 2008 15:13:08 -0000 Colin Paul Adams - 27 Jun 2008 15:16:49 -0000 <= Scott Trenda - 27 Jun 2008 15:23:43 -0000 Colin Paul Adams - 27 Jun 2008 15:25:51 -0000 Andrew Welch - 27 Jun 2008 15:39:49 -0000 Joe Fawcett - 27 Jun 2008 15:44:04 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda	Thread	RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda	Date	RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda
	Month