|
Subject: Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:25:26 +0100 |
>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> writes:
Scott> I mean a language, to be used on the server side on web
Scott> servers, that can talk to the database, the file system,
Scott> and other protocols, and dynamically assemble an HTML or
Scott> XML view of a requested page to be delivered to the
Scott> client.
XSLT?
Scott> Also, I don't claim to know why you think preprocessors are
Scott> "just bad", but just because many of the current
Scott> implementations are ugly doesn't make the idea flawed.
Ready any text book on the subject.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda | Thread | Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Andrew Welch |
| RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda | Date | RE: [xsl] Split with delimiter and , Pankaj Chaturvedi |
| Month |