Subject: Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:25:26 +0100 |
>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Trenda <Scott.Trenda@xxxxxxxx> writes: Scott> I mean a language, to be used on the server side on web Scott> servers, that can talk to the database, the file system, Scott> and other protocols, and dynamically assemble an HTML or Scott> XML view of a requested page to be delivered to the Scott> client. XSLT? Scott> Also, I don't claim to know why you think preprocessors are Scott> "just bad", but just because many of the current Scott> implementations are ugly doesn't make the idea flawed. Ready any text book on the subject. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda | Thread | Re: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Andrew Welch |
RE: [xsl] LINQ to XML versus XSLT, Scott Trenda | Date | RE: [xsl] Split with delimiter and , Pankaj Chaturvedi |
Month |