Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: OOXML From: Deborah Pickett <debbiep-list-xsl@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:37:55 +1000 |
[snip]Case in point: I don't consider XSLT to be functional because of the hoops you have to go through to get something resembling lambda functions. [...]Not exactly lambda-functions, but various ways of creating dynamically new functions are well-known and have been supported with FXSL for years:
Closures are something I'd be curious to see done in XSLT, though I still have never come across a programming problem in real life that was best solved by using them.Has been done for quite some time; see: http://dnovatchev.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!44B0A32C2CCF7488!384.entry
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: OOXML, Deborah Pickett | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: OOXML, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Re: OOXML, Deborah Pickett | Date | Re: [xsl] Cocoon, Andrew Welch |
Month |