Subject: Re: [xsl] Whitespace Copied in Element Content Nodes From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:04:14 +0100 |
> I don't think it would matter whether you use Saxon SA or B for it (it is > ignorable whitespace, not illegal whitespace). The behaviour would be different if the schema (or DTD) were used, ignorable white space is stripped by default in that case while building tthe input tree. see respectively http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel/#const-infoset-text http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel/#const-psvi-text This is an (incompatible) change between XSLT1 and XSLT2 (or rather a change between the interfaces between those systems and their XML parsers). David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Whitespace Copied in Elem, Abel Braaksma (onlin | Thread | Re: [xsl] Whitespace Copied in Elem, Abel Braaksma (onlin |
Re: [xsl] Whitespace Copied in Elem, Abel Braaksma (onlin | Date | Re: [xsl] Whitespace Copied in Elem, Abel Braaksma (onlin |
Month |