Subject: Re: [xsl] Whitespace Copied in Element Content Nodes From: "Abel Braaksma (online)" <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:40:27 +0200 (CEST) |
David Carlisle wrote: > >> I don't think it would matter whether you use Saxon SA or B for it (it is >> ignorable whitespace, not illegal whitespace). > > > The behaviour would be different if the schema (or DTD) were used, ignorable > white space is stripped by default in that case while building tthe > input tree. > > see respectively > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel/#const-infoset-text > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel/#const-psvi-text > I looked and I overlooked :) Thanks for pointing me to these!
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Whitespace Copied in Elem, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] FO Table widths - table-layou, Karl Stubsjoen |
Re: [xsl] Whitespace Copied in Elem, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Changing the Attibute Val, Florent Georges |
Month |