Subject: Re: [xsl] create XSLT from XML or XSD|
From: "Michael Dykman" <mdykman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 11:15:52 -0400
Sign... I pressed 'reply' too soon.. I'll complete the first paragraph. ....While it certainly does not expose 100% of XSL's functionality, it has proved effective for me and my team for rapid web development and has been used to rip data OUT of html into arbitrary XML formats. It is extensible and I am anxious to see some additional use-cases. On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Michael Dykman <mdykman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Henry, > > I have published a tool, Dexter, which does precisely that, assumig > XSL 1.0 is acceptable. While most of the use-cases I had in mind were > designed for XHTML, it's operations are pretty generic. While it > certainly does not expose 100% of XSL's functionality, > > I just released a new package a couple of days ago which I belive to > be stable... at least it has no bugs that I am aware of. I apologize > if the documentation is a little dense; it's all there but I have had > a few complaints about the lack of end-to-end quick and dirty > examples. > > http://code.google.com/p/dexter-xsl/ > > If you do decide to give it a try, I would be more than happy to coach > you through the leaning curve, but contact me directly. The > particulars of Dexter are somewhat outside the scope of this list. > > - michael dykman > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:53 AM, henry human <henry_human@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi >> I have some very large XSD files. It is a little sore >> to build the according XSL files for them I thougth to >> generate the XML files for them with the tool and >> create the XSL files from the XMLs. Is there any tool >> which do that?? >> thanks >> henry >> >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail. >> Dem pfiffigeren Posteingang. >> http://de.overview.mail.yahoo.com >> >> > > > > -- > - michael dykman > - mdykman@xxxxxxxxx > > - All models are wrong. Some models are useful. > -- - michael dykman - mdykman@xxxxxxxxx - All models are wrong. Some models are useful.