Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendant-or-self::node()

Subject: Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendant-or-self::node()
From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:40:25 +0200 (CEST)

Andrew Welch wrote:

> Why does // expand to descendant-or-self::node() rather than to
> descendant::x where x is the next item in the path?

  How would you expand //@a then?

  Regards,

--drkm

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendant-or-self::node(), (continued) David Carlisle - 17 Sep 2008 16:11:53 -0000 Andrew Welch - 17 Sep 2008 17:43:56 -0000 Message not available Wendell Piez - 17 Sep 2008 18:47:12 -0000 Message not available Andrew Welch - 17 Sep 2008 19:20:08 -0000 Florent Georges - 16 Sep 2008 13:40:49 -0000 <= Michael Kay - 16 Sep 2008 15:20:04 -0000 Andrew Welch - 16 Sep 2008 16:54:08 -0000 Michael Kay - 16 Sep 2008 18:08:58 -0000 Evan Lenz - 16 Sep 2008 23:52:28 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendant-or-self::node(), (continued)
- Florent Georges - 16 Sep 2008 13:40:49 -0000 <=
- Michael Kay - 16 Sep 2008 15:20:04 -0000
  - Andrew Welch - 16 Sep 2008 16:54:08 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 16 Sep 2008 18:08:58 -0000
  - Evan Lenz - 16 Sep 2008 23:52:28 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendan, Andrew Welch	Thread	RE: [xsl] // expanding to descendan, Michael Kay
Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendan, David Carlisle	Date	Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendan, Andrew Welch
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home