Subject: Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendant-or-self::node() From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:11:26 +0100 |
> the distinction between //foo[1] and (//foo)[1]. That has got to be > the biggest downside of the way "//" is defined. and anyway any blemish in the definition of // is minor compared to != which would have been better not being defined, since 9 times out of 10 when it is used it does the wrong thing. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendan, Evan Lenz | Thread | Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendan, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendan, Evan Lenz | Date | Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendan, Andrew Welch |
Month |