Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendant-or-self::node()

Subject: Re: [xsl] // expanding to descendant-or-self::node()
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 17:11:26 +0100
> the distinction between //foo[1] and (//foo)[1]. That has got to be
> the biggest downside of the way "//"  is defined.

and anyway any blemish in the definition of // is minor compared to !=
which would have been better not being defined, since 9 times out of 10
when it is used it does the wrong thing.

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

Current Thread