|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:34:56 +0100 (CET) |
"G. Ken Holman" wrote:
> I often have two namespaces for each library: a public one
> (declaring global constructs users of the black box are allowed
> to override) and a private one (declaring global constructs users
> of the black box are not allowed to override).
I also use this technique. I wonder what naming scheme people here
use for the private namespace URI. Personally, over the time I use(d)
three different kinds of naming schemes:
http://company.com/project/some-stylesheet.xsl
some-stylesheet.xsl
impl:some-stylesheet.xsl
where "some-stylesheet.xsl" can have more levels, reflecting the
project structure:
http://company.com/project/some-module/some-style.xsl
Sometimes, I just use the same URI within all the stylesheets in the
project (mostly for small projects.)
Does someone use something else, or have any comments on those above?
Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, G. Ken Holman |
| Re: [xsl] XPATH problem, Sam Byland | Date | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, G. Ken Holman |
| Month |