Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names

Subject: Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names
From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:34:56 +0100 (CET)
"G. Ken Holman" wrote:

> I often have two namespaces for each library:  a public one 
> (declaring global constructs users of the black box are allowed
> to override) and a private one (declaring global constructs users
> of the black box are not allowed to override).

  I also use this technique.  I wonder what naming scheme people here
use for the private namespace URI.  Personally, over the time I use(d)
three different kinds of naming schemes:

    http://company.com/project/some-stylesheet.xsl
    some-stylesheet.xsl
    impl:some-stylesheet.xsl

where "some-stylesheet.xsl" can have more levels, reflecting the
project structure:

    http://company.com/project/some-module/some-style.xsl

  Sometimes, I just use the same URI within all the stylesheets in the
project (mostly for small projects.)

  Does someone use something else, or have any comments on those above?

  Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/

Current Thread