Subject: Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 15:34:56 +0100 (CET) |
"G. Ken Holman" wrote: > I often have two namespaces for each library: a public one > (declaring global constructs users of the black box are allowed > to override) and a private one (declaring global constructs users > of the black box are not allowed to override). I also use this technique. I wonder what naming scheme people here use for the private namespace URI. Personally, over the time I use(d) three different kinds of naming schemes: http://company.com/project/some-stylesheet.xsl some-stylesheet.xsl impl:some-stylesheet.xsl where "some-stylesheet.xsl" can have more levels, reflecting the project structure: http://company.com/project/some-module/some-style.xsl Sometimes, I just use the same URI within all the stylesheets in the project (mostly for small projects.) Does someone use something else, or have any comments on those above? Regards, -- Florent Georges http://www.fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] XPATH problem, Sam Byland | Date | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, G. Ken Holman |
Month |