Subject: Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2008 10:01:12 -0500 |
"G. Ken Holman" wrote:
> I often have two namespaces for each library: a public one > (declaring global constructs users of the black box are allowed > to override) and a private one (declaring global constructs users > of the black box are not allowed to override).
I also use this technique. I wonder what naming scheme people here use for the private namespace URI. Personally, over the time I use(d) three different kinds of naming schemes:
http://company.com/project/some-stylesheet.xsl some-stylesheet.xsl impl:some-stylesheet.xsl
where "some-stylesheet.xsl" can have more levels, reflecting the project structure:
http://company.com/project/some-module/some-style.xsl
Sometimes, I just use the same URI within all the stylesheets in the project (mostly for small projects.)
Does someone use something else, or have any comments on those above?
http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/ns/xslstyle http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/ns/xslstyle/vocabulary
-- Upcoming XSLT/XSL-FO hands-on courses: Wellington, NZ 2009-01 Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video Video sample lesson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg Video course overview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Florent Georges | Date | Re: [xsl] Qualified variable names, Florent Georges |
Month |