Subject: Re: [xsl] Is normalization is optional? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:10:51 GMT |
Xquery is off topic for this list but the question (could be) an xpath one. short answer to the question in the title is yes. Longer answer is that eq, if used on strings, is defined to do a numeric comparison of the number returned by compare() on the two strings. Since since this is the two argument form of compare() it will use the default collation in the static context, the "default default" is unicode codepoint collation which does no normalisation but a system can supply any default collation that it wants, so long as it documents what that is. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Is normalization is optional?, Vyacheslav Sedov | Thread | RE: [xsl] Is normalization is optio, Michael Kay |
[xsl] Is normalization is optional?, Vyacheslav Sedov | Date | Re: [xsl] fault tolerant saxon:pars, Andrew Welch |
Month |