Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequences or sequence references? From: "Vladimir Nesterovsky" <vladimir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 02:31:51 -0800 |
I know this won't help a lot, however one may use this feature implemented as a set of Saxon extension functions: http://www.nesterovsky-bros.com/weblog/2008/05/18/TuplesAndMapsInSaxon.aspx Thanks. -- Vladimir Nesterovsky http://www.nesterovsky-bros.com -------- Original Message -------- > From: "Florent Georges" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 11:56 AM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequences or sequence references? > > Vladimir Nesterovsky wrote: > > > See http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5630 > > Thanks. Well, I guess there is no point to spend time writing > another submission, with the scope reduced (only make-tuple(), > tuple-sequence() and is-tuple().) The answer would be the same: not > for 2.1, maybe after, as it would introduced a new type and changed > atomization rules... > > Unfortunately, as this is the major drawback of XSLT I think. > Closely followed by a try/catch mechanism. > > Regards, > > -- > Florent Georges > http://www.fgeorges.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequen, Florent Georges | Thread | [xsl] XML to XML Namespace conversi, Casper Voortman |
RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequen, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Problem with < and >, Michael Ludwig |
Month |