|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Test processing instruction as first preceding sibling From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 16:03:51 GMT |
> In this case it should return true.
This implies that you wish to ignore white space text nodes, otherwise
the immediately preceding node is a text node not a PI.
> preceding-sibling::*[1]
* matches element nodes, you want
preceding-sibling::node()[1]
then to test if that is a PI, you can do
preceding-sibling::node()[1]/self::processing-instruction('proc')
This wil work for examppl eif you have already removed the white space
with
<xsl:strip-space elements="*"/>
if you can not remove the white space as it is needed elsewhere the test
needs to be
preceding-sibling::node()[not(text()[not(normalize-space())])][1]/self::processing-instruction('proc')
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [xsl] Test processing instruction a, Alexandre Moraes | Thread | Re: [xsl] Test processing instructi, Martin Honnen |
| RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequen, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Test processing instructi, Martin Honnen |
| Month |