Re: [xsl] Test processing instruction as first preceding sibling

Subject: Re: [xsl] Test processing instruction as first preceding sibling
From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 23:13:14 +0100 (CET)
"G. Ken Holman" wrote:

>           preceding-sibling::node()[not(self::text())][1]/
>                       self::processing-instruction('proc')

  Depending on the OP's needs, maybe the following is more suitable:

    preceding-sibling::node()[
        not(self::text()[not(normalize-space(.))])
    ][1]/self::processing-instruction('proc')

(takes precedings text nodes into account if they are not whitespaces
only.)

  Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/

Current Thread