Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequences or sequence reference

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequences or sequence references?
From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 18:36:28 +0100 (CET)

Dimitre Novatchev wrote:

> Why not use the existing EXSLT mailing list?

  Because I didn't think about it? :-)  Indeed, that makes perfect
sense.

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequences or sequence references?, (continued) Message not available vasu chakkera - 9 Dec 2008 16:29:03 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 9 Dec 2008 17:25:53 -0000 Florent Georges - 9 Dec 2008 16:34:48 -0000 Dimitre Novatchev - 9 Dec 2008 17:21:54 -0000 Florent Georges - 9 Dec 2008 17:36:51 -0000 <= James Fuller - 9 Dec 2008 17:43:08 -0000 Florent Georges - 10 Dec 2008 16:21:49 -0000 Vladimir Nesterovsky - 8 Dec 2008 04:50:41 -0000 Florent Georges - 8 Dec 2008 09:35:57 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequences or sequence references?, (continued)
- Vladimir Nesterovsky - 8 Dec 2008 04:50:41 -0000
  - Florent Georges - 8 Dec 2008 09:35:57 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequen, Dimitre Novatchev	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequen, James Fuller
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequen, Dimitre Novatchev	Date	Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.1: Nestable sequen, James Fuller
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home