Subject: Re: [xsl] xpath syntax error From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:43:00 GMT |
> Why is that? > Do I really have to rewrite my xpath expression to xslt patterns are not xpath, they have a commpletely separate grammar, they just look like a subset of xpath. > <xsl:template match='*[self::p or self::q][count(node()) = 0]'/>? yes although you almost never need write count(node()) (which if saxon didn't optimise it away would mean that the system actually had to cound the nodes, which means searching all the children) instead just use [not(node())] which is true if there are no children. i'd write it as p[not(node())]|q[not(node())] David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] xpath syntax error, Ruud Grosmann | Thread | RE: [xsl] xpath syntax error, Michael Kay |
[xsl] xpath syntax error, Ruud Grosmann | Date | RE: [xsl] xpath syntax error, Michael Kay |
Month |