|
Subject: Re: [xsl] xpath syntax error From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:20:55 +0100 (CET) |
Andrew Welch wrote:
> Sometimes it's bit nicer to keep them separate:
> match="p[not(node())]"/>
> match="q[not(node())]"/>
Yup. And if the predicate is quite complex, one can always
encapsulate it into a user-defined function:
match="p[my:predicate(.)]"/>
Regards,
--
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] xpath syntax error, Ruud Grosmann | Thread | [xsl] cross reference call of templ, Michael Richter |
| Re: [xsl] xpath syntax error, Ruud Grosmann | Date | [xsl] cross reference call of templ, Michael Richter |
| Month |