Subject: Re: [xsl] AltovaXML and fragment identifier From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:23:48 GMT |
> Isn't that error XTDE1170 only supposed to be thrown if a fragment > identifier is used in a URI passed to the unparsed-text function? yes I think that is correct, this is the wrong code, however a system is allowed to reject any URI at all and if it chooses to reject all uri with fragids passed to doc() or document() it can do that, but it should raise [err:FODC0005]. f&o spec says: ...If the Available documents provides no mapping for the string, an error is raised [err:FODC0005]. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] AltovaXML and fragment identi, Martin Honnen | Thread | RE: [xsl] AltovaXML and fragment id, Michael Kay |
[xsl] AltovaXML and fragment identi, Martin Honnen | Date | RE: [xsl] AltovaXML and fragment id, Michael Kay |
Month |