Re: [xsl] AltovaXML and fragment identifier

[David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>]

I wrote

> , however a system is
> allowed to reject any URI at all and if it chooses to reject all uri
> with fragids passed to doc() or document() it can do that, but it should
> raise [err:FODC0005]. 

which is false. It's true for doc() (which was what I was reading)  but
for document() the spec explictly says that the fragment identifier
should be stripped off and used after retrieval.

So 

document('test2009031701.xml#f1')

is the same as

document('test2009031701.xml')/id('f1')

or


document('test2009031701.xml')/id('f1')


or an error, depending on various factors....



So, I don't thinl the system is correct if it raises an error for
test2009031701.xml#f1 but not for test2009031701.xml.

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________