Subject: Re: [xsl] AltovaXML and fragment identifier From: Michael Ludwig <mlu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:27:28 +0200 |
If this nice behaviour is mandatory in 2.0, could you provide a pointer to the part of the spec saying so? (I couldn't find it.)
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#document
[quotes snipped]
then
document('test2009031701.xml#f1')
is explictly defined to work like
document('test2009031701.xml')/id('f1')
in XSLT 2.0
Thanks. I had read the parts of the spec you quoted but hadn't understood how they would explictly define the former invocation to work like the latter. But I believe you they do, of course! (And I can see some implementations do so as well.)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] AltovaXML and fragment id, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] merge translated text into En, Hoskins, Dorothy [OC |
Re: [xsl] Iterate through tree stru, jim mcgovern | Date | Re: [xsl] Iterate through tree stru, jim mcgovern |
Month |