Subject: Re: [xsl] Need test for preceding-sibling From: Lars Huttar <lars_huttar@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:52:22 -0500 |
On 4/23/2009 1:35 PM, Hintz, David L wrote: > Thanks, Ken! I should have been clearer in my description. Each <a1> and <a2> should be paired, even though there may be intervening tags. However, an <a2> without its paired <a1> should not be processed. I'll try your grouping solution. > At 2009-04-23 16:23 -0400, Hintz, David L wrote: > Now I see that I over-simplified the problem. The XSLT also has to > suppress any <a1> that is not paired with an <a2>. In the case of <a1/> <b/> <a1/> <c/> <a2/> which <a1/> do you want to suppress? Just curious. It seems like the requirement is still ill-defined, but maybe that's just me. Would it be possible to use XML structure for pairing, as in <a> <b /> </a> instead of <a1/> <b/> <a2/> ? That allow you to leverage the pairing facilities that XML offers natively. Lars
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Need test for preceding-s, G. Ken Holman | Thread | RE: [xsl] Need test for preceding-s, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] creating of id and refid, Martin Honnen | Date | [xsl] How to sort by elements of a , Leo Studer |
Month |