|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL - Documentation From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 08:18:09 -0400 |
At 2009-05-13 11:57 +0200, Michael Schdfer wrote:
So I think that allowing the full set of DITA and DocBook features for use in comments may introduce unnecessary complexity.
Interestingly I saw the choice of DITA and DocBook as introducing simplicity because in both cases I use off-the-shelf stylesheets (included in the package) that render these vocabularies to HTML. No need to write one's own documentation vocabulary and then stylesheets for that vocabulary.
And I have a number of customers' stylesheets documented with lists, graphics, tables, program listings and other constructs that are all sitting there ready to use in the off-the-shelf vocabularies.
best, -Rob
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSL - Documentation, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL - Documentation, G. Ken Holman |
| Re: [xsl] XSL - Documentation, G. Ken Holman | Date | [xsl] Grouping question, M Balaji |
| Month |