Subject: RE: [xsl] returning nodes which have a specific child From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:19:04 +0100 |
> But that's no reason > to try to provide post-hoc justifications, either, IMO. Except that the post-hoc justification is exactly the same as the pre-hoc one, namely that a very high proportion of XSLT usage is rendition (often to HTML), in which case skipping unknown tags makes excellent sense. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] returning nodes which hav, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] returning nodes which hav, Michael Sokolov |
Re: [xsl] Is it possible to rewrite, Martin Honnen | Date | RE: [xsl] Is it possible to rewrite, Michael Kay |
Month |