Subject: Re: [xsl] Correct way to test for no match From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 13:13:40 -0400 |
One other thought on this. The reason it is important to know if I don't have a match is that there should always be a match and it is important to report this state.
<xsl:template match="node()|@*" priority="-1"> <xsl:message>Not handled: .....
debug.xsl: <xsl:template match="node()|@*"> <xsl:message>Not handled: .....
-- Upcoming: hands-on code list, UBL, XSLT, XQuery and XSL-FO classes in Copenhagen Denmark and Washington DC USA, October/November 2009 Interested in other classes? http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/i/ Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video Video lesson: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg&fmt=18 Video overview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE&fmt=18 G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Correct way to test for n, Dan Vint | Thread | Re: [xsl] Correct way to test for n, Dan Vint |
Re: [xsl] trouble with preceding:: , Chris Wolf | Date | Re: [xsl] Correct way to test for n, Dan Vint |
Month |