Subject: Re: [xsl] Fwd: Is this a Saxon Bug ? From: Bruno Mascret <bmascret@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:26:57 +0200 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I totally agree with you ;-) And it's sometimes hard to see which program is faulty. By the way, we found another solution for teh too many nested function calls problem: we gave the -Xss10000K option to java VM and saxon doesn't launch the exception anymore. Best regards, Bruno Michael Kay wrote: >> The problem was the xerces implementation used in java 6. >> I switched to apache libs and it seems that it now works really fine. > > It really scares me that so many people are building critical applications > using this parser. It's junk. And it's junk in a horrible way - it doesn't > fail, it reports the wrong data to the application. I find it amazing that > Sun get away with it. > > Regards, > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ > http://twitter.com/michaelhkay > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkrN6KEACgkQaOubDsBUvbuDLQCfUZs8q0BbwuI2Sb7aTyfh4fj4 n+8AnRdNcLVvQafM0OBLcV69fbqZnhHh =Df+T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Fwd: Is this a Saxon Bug , Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] SGML Inclusions and infinitiv, Don Smith |
Re: [xsl] Anyway to avoid a syntax , Martin Honnen | Date | Re: [xsl] Different results on diff, Joelle Tegwen |
Month |