Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT (2) namespace safe i18n patterns From: Mike Odling-Smee <mike.odlingsmee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:53:26 +0000 |
> xml:lang is all about mixing languages in the same file, however that > often causes more problems than in solves, and far better to have one > language per file. I would be interested to understand what complications you are referring to. I have a project where - perhaps misguidedly - I do have translations in one file. The advantages I see in doing this is that it is easy to see if any translations are missing (indeed a simple XSLT could tell you this) and would readily allow the translator to see the original text and perhaps existing translations in other languages. Finally I think it makes it trivial to define an XSLT function for fallback processing for missing country/language translations. Regards, Michael Odling-Smee www.xml-solutions.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT (2) namespace safe i, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT (2) namespace safe i, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] XSLT (2) namespace safe i, Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT (2) namespace safe i, Andrew Welch |
Month |