Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C drafts) From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:39:32 -0600 |
On 12/16/09 9:29 AM, "Florent Georges" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > David Carlisle wrote: > >>> Is there somewhere a discussion of what is new and different >>> in XPath 2.1? > >> higher order functions as items in the data model, weheee.... > >> (you'll have to ask a member of the WG for a more considered >> view) > > Yes, with inline functions and of course calling syntax. You > also have simple let expressions. At the risk of seeming dim or lazy or both, can someone explain the implications of these new features? Or point to explanations? Thanks, E. -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 610.631.6770 www.reallysi.com www.rsuitecms.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C draf, Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C draf, Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C draf, Florent Georges | Date | [xsl] Entities in XSLT (from XML pa, Costello, Roger L. |
Month |