Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C drafts)

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C drafts)

Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C drafts)
From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:29:32 +0000 (GMT)

David Carlisle wrote:

> > Is there somewhere a discussion of what is new and
different
> > in XPath 2.1?

> higher order functions as items in the data
model, weheee....

> (you'll have to ask a member of the WG for a more
considered
> view)

  Yes, with inline functions and of course calling syntax.
You
also have simple let expressions.

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C drafts), (continued) Michael Müller-Hillebrand - 16 Dec 2009 14:08:22 -0000 Michael Kay - 16 Dec 2009 14:31:54 -0000 Eliot Kimber - 16 Dec 2009 14:54:10 -0000 David Carlisle - 16 Dec 2009 15:05:02 -0000 Florent Georges - 16 Dec 2009 15:29:51 -0000 <= Eliot Kimber - 16 Dec 2009 15:39:57 -0000 Florent Georges - 16 Dec 2009 15:57:33 -0000 Eliot Kimber - 16 Dec 2009 16:02:02 -0000 Michael Kay - 16 Dec 2009 16:08:14 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C drafts), (continued)
- Eliot Kimber - 16 Dec 2009 14:54:10 -0000
  - David Carlisle - 16 Dec 2009 15:05:02 -0000
    - Florent Georges - 16 Dec 2009 15:29:51 -0000 <=
    - Eliot Kimber - 16 Dec 2009 15:39:57 -0000
    - Florent Georges - 16 Dec 2009 15:57:33 -0000
    - Eliot Kimber - 16 Dec 2009 16:02:02 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 16 Dec 2009 16:08:14 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C draf, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C draf, Eliot Kimber
[xsl] Syntax Highlighting, Heiko Niemann	Date	Re: [xsl] XPath (and other W3C draf, Eliot Kimber
	Month