Subject: RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format) From: Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:12:59 -0500 |
> For the next version of XSLT I've also added tools that will > generate SVG diagrams from source XML descriptions of trees. Don't suppose you plan to make this snippet public? > Have you considered docbook? The xmlspec system is a bit > specialized. Seconded. Although I presonally use TEI for this sort of thing, that's because I'm so familiar with it. DocBook is probably the system best suited to general technical documentation.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Just Heard About Symphony, Vyacheslav Sedov | Date | RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay |
Month |