RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools,

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format)

Subject: RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format)
From: Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 18:12:59 -0500

> For the next version of XSLT I've also added tools that will
> generate SVG diagrams from source XML descriptions of trees.

Don't suppose you plan to make this snippet public? 


> Have you considered docbook? The xmlspec system is a bit
> specialized.

Seconded. Although I presonally use TEI for this sort of thing,
that's because I'm so familiar with it. DocBook is probably the
system best suited to general technical documentation.

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format), (continued) Abel Braaksma - 22 Jan 2010 22:29:07 -0000 Michael Kay - 22 Jan 2010 23:30:57 -0000 David Carlisle - 23 Jan 2010 11:02:08 -0000 Michael Kay - 22 Jan 2010 23:24:50 -0000 Syd Bauman - 23 Jan 2010 23:13:33 -0000 <= Michael Kay - 24 Jan 2010 00:14:37 -0000 Vyacheslav Sedov - 24 Jan 2010 05:37:16 -0000 Michael Kay - 24 Jan 2010 12:03:48 -0000 Vyacheslav Sedov - 24 Jan 2010 13:12:04 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format), (continued)
- Abel Braaksma - 22 Jan 2010 22:29:07 -0000
  - Michael Kay - 22 Jan 2010 23:30:57 -0000
    - David Carlisle - 23 Jan 2010 11:02:08 -0000
- Michael Kay - 22 Jan 2010 23:24:50 -0000
  - Syd Bauman - 23 Jan 2010 23:13:33 -0000 <=
    - Michael Kay - 24 Jan 2010 00:14:37 -0000
    - Vyacheslav Sedov - 24 Jan 2010 05:37:16 -0000
    - Michael Kay - 24 Jan 2010 12:03:48 -0000
    - Vyacheslav Sedov - 24 Jan 2010 13:12:04 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay	Thread	RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay
Re: [xsl] Just Heard About Symphony, Vyacheslav Sedov	Date	RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay
	Month