Subject: Re: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2.0 norm written (tools, format) From: Vyacheslav Sedov <vyacheslav.sedov@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:36:52 +0300 |
i guess OpenOffice is best authoring tool - is not it? 2010/1/24 Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > For the next version of XSLT I've also added tools that >> will generate >> > SVG diagrams from source XML descriptions of trees. >> >> Don't suppose you plan to make this snippet public? >> > > I'll focus my efforts on getting the spec out first. Then ask me how it was > done. > > Regards, > > Michael Kay > http://www.saxonica.com/ > http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] question on support of st, Hermann Stamm-Wilbra | Date | RE: [xsl] [MISC] How was the XSLT 2, Michael Kay |
Month |