Subject: Re: [xsl] best practices, insert PI with XSLT or otherwise? From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:32:52 -0500 |
It was a revelation to me working on a country-wide deployment of XML (the UBL standard in Denmark) when my client was informed that tens of thousands of Java developers wanted to look at the information only as filed-in data structures and not as XML. I don't know how that can be changed.
In the project I cited earlier XSLT drove all of the steps up until the end delivery until a last-minute change prompted the Java developers to inject themselves in the process because they refused to leverage the existing XSLT to add the fix.
How can Java programmers be convinced that XSLT is an appropriate language for XML?
Cheers, Wendell
====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] best practices, insert PI, G. Ken Holman | Thread | [xsl] dynamically generate value fo, Mario Madunic |
Re: [xsl] are all strings in a sequ, ac | Date | Re: [xsl] dynamically generate valu, Wendell Piez |
Month |